Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Amateur Traders Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sharck who wrote (18997)	4/30/2002 3:03:49 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19633

Did you see my post to you yesterday on KLAC & INTC here ? Message 17400754 Well they turned back up off those support levels for nice gains today , and perhaps if you weren't so busy being a ----->" human pop-up ad " for your rinky-dink $200/mo paysite where the "MOMO RULES THE DAY" ...and the sheep all follow you in... ;-) you would have looked more into those suggestions as trades . Yes even you can learn somethings sharckie.<g> Now stop wearing your mother's high-heels and dress and contribute something contructive besides spamming your pay-room , or get off this site . regards Mars PS: You should pay more attention to the semi's and OJ's analysis , they are wonderful traders.

To: Sharck who wrote (18997)	4/30/2002 5:40:49 PM
From: Paul A	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19633

Sharck- this whole thing has gotten out of hand, and I managed to stay out of it from the beginning and I still plan on staying out of it since its not my concern.. but one question I have that is bugging me after reading all your posts.. You keep making references such as 'You will soon see' etc etc.. Am I reading this the wrong way or do you have something in the works planned to right the wrong you feel that took place here? Has the lawyer already been notified? just curious...

To: Sharck who wrote (18997)	4/30/2002 7:26:01 PM
From: JustTradeEm	Respond to of 19633

Joe, I ask you, what is the difference then, to attacking people, (which I certainly am not, never did, and never will) when they are away, and Tom's action of banning me from defending myself against attacks? John, I'm not sure what your purpose was in initiating this and perpetuating it, but I'll play along. First of all, this all would have remained on Tom's site, private, out of all SI eyes, if YOU had not brought it here. Nobody from Tom's site posted a thing about you here .... and yes, I take your recent posts as attacks on Tom personally and the "scumbags" on his site. Now, one could surmise you're taking the approach that any publicity is good publicity .... for DA ROOM of course ... so maybe, as you alluded to, you initiated this all intentionally and I've just taken your bait. Personally, if you had something to say to Tom, it could and SHOULD have been done privately via email. So John, this comment ... (which I certainly am not, never did, and never will) is simply BS ! Don't take me wrong here John, you used to be held in high regard around here ... and I'm sure you're a "top gun" trader in many eyes, but sadly, as my PM box would prove to you, you're seen as no better than a used car salesman these days by many also. That was your choice John, not mine. JB