SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KevinMark who wrote (59263)4/30/2002 3:44:30 PM
From: KevinMark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
Shorts are catching sweltering hot lava up the arse right now on VRSN.



To: KevinMark who wrote (59263)4/30/2002 3:47:21 PM
From: heehee1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Kevin and Ron,

Anything is a possibility. But given the macro economic scenario, ie debt levels, political unrests, WS BS, the 3000 level is highly unlikely. But dream away.



To: KevinMark who wrote (59263)4/30/2002 3:47:24 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
i will file in storage section. I hope to remember to post it at a later date as a token of either your rightness or wrongnes.Max



To: KevinMark who wrote (59263)4/30/2002 4:01:12 PM
From: Jeff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
kevin...... i explained my views on this board and gave many examples showing charts and explaining certain chart set ups i see from time to time.....along with fundamental reasons that are destroying the market.....

would you care to do the same.....

its easy to say you see so and so coming.....

i'm just interested in how we get to 3000 nasdaq this year on a technical basis's.....

or for that matter on a fundamental basis.....

thanks....



To: KevinMark who wrote (59263)4/30/2002 5:51:20 PM
From: shaun gehring  Respond to of 99280
 
I think you and Ron should not be alone. We could even see NAS 3500 by 2003.

"Think outside the box"

Shaun