Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Softechie who wrote (59840)	5/1/2002 1:53:10 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

Well, we are printing that elusive 1670 as I type. Took the INVN off when it could barely go to $22, just $.34 profit. Watching if 1670 can be taken ot not before deciding on taking the Q and other traders off the able. Zeev

To: Softechie who wrote (59840)	5/1/2002 2:21:39 PM
From: DebtBomb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

It looks like it Softechie, rotation out of techs, going into the Dow and consumer goods stocks. It could mean, there isn't enough money in funds to go around, so they dump tech. Tech is still selling on my screens.

To: Softechie who wrote (59840)	5/1/2002 2:21:42 PM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 99280

The key thing about these major computer driven Jams, they have been happening over and over but FAIL time and again. To me, because these movements are so blatant within the context of this listless market, they are revealing just how weak this market is. But this brings in Biringyi again when he says he is not trading large caps because of the these sudden ups and downs are all manipulation and are, in his view, unpredictable. These big computer programs are NOT investing LTBH, they are churning. Max