SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (85019)5/1/2002 3:33:14 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116833
 
Rent controls and minimum wage may be stupid and I for one have always thought them counter productive but they are part of the political fabric of our society. And there are more tenants than landlords. A fact of life and votes. All I'm saying to you is that pro-capitalist dogma assumes that the capitalists have acted out of the goodness of their hearts when it comes to society at large. God, the examples are endless - consider the release for sale of harmful medicines like thalidomide. Pollution of lakes and streams with industrial waste. In many ways we live in what would 80 years ago be considered a socialist society.



To: long-gone who wrote (85019)5/1/2002 10:10:19 PM
From: John Soileau  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116833
 
OT Richard, you are absolutely right. Socialism, and other misguided attempts to defy market forces, are doomed to failure over time. Unintended and perverse consequences of such policies are unfortunately typical. For example, rent control prevents the construction of new housing stock (supply), yet demand for housing marches on, so the price of housing stays artificially high--the price is actually PREVENTED from falling, by a misguided policy intended to reduce housing costs for the people. Minimum wage laws distort the natural labor market, and merely reallocate wage dollars from the now unnecessarily-unemployed to the now marginally better-paid employed. So a law intended to help the laborer perversely creates additional unemployment. This is the "dead hand of regulation" at work. It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.
Marx promoted socialism from a then-popular viewpoint that man was inherently good, charitable, giving--he believed that we only needed to set up a socialist society to bring these innate qualities out in all citizens. OK, we've had many socialist experiments since then, and they have provided no evidence of man's innate goodness, in fact just the opposite.
On the other hand, Adam Smith started from the richly-supported assumption that man is inherently greedy, and he promoted capitalism since it efficiently harnessed the many lesser evils (individual greed) to the greater social good. Capitalism hasn't been a perfect experiment, but it just blows the socialist model out of the water. Even Albania eventually caught on. Earth to Castro.
John