Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Amateur Traders Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (19016)	5/1/2002 11:19:05 PM
From: Paul A	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19633

Sharck- should I make some of what we emailed each other just now public? or wait for you to do so as you did earlier when you emailed me earlier in the week to 'help' you and didnt like my response? Below is a post I made on ATC site today re-OVER: "YEHA!!! I feel extra special on this one given it was the source of the argument last week.. The only issue I had with Sharck was his post on s/i that trashed all of us and Toms OSIS and OVER calls.. " below is a post that was made by Sharck last week (Sunday) which I was referring to: "In one final note, our site IS free, but yes, we are evolving into a nominal fee based room. Looking at the two calls that were made in your room that started all this, IE holding OSIS from 24 to 17, while we went long at 17, and sold at 21, and your SSs on OVER where we were long, 26 to 35, is a perfect example of "getting what you pay for" and adds strength to our case. " ... So how the hell can you say I am slandering you today??? Was that someone else who posted that message on Sunday and not you? So let me understand this.. IM not allowed to say ANYTHING with regards to you? why??? Who the fuck are you?? seriously : )