Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (11604)	5/1/2002 11:32:42 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Thanks for the clarification Neo (though it was not truly necessary). Sox were big winners tonight. One of the roads traveled in the earlier discussion was whether we could think up any sexual act so depraved as to provoke condemnation by those who defend all acts that are consensual and performed behind closed doors. My own experiences were inadequate to probe the bottom, but others helped, and the list expanded. For my money, urination and defecation on each other won first prize (or bottom prize). I think someone said they had witnessed worse than that in a video. I would say that the exercise proved that, for some, there is no conceivable act that they would condemn, because to do so would be judgmental of others' right to their sexual preferences. I agree that there are philosophical dimensions to such a discussion. Too bad you weren't there to offer your insights ... but on the other hand, I think you were wise or lucky not to have done so. ;-)