Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (79067)	5/2/2002 12:32:53 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Ali, Re: "By redirecting the question to his peers, he buys them and himself the necessary moments to formulate a politically correct well-rounded answer." LOL. "Politically Correct" Jerry. The same guy that just got finished saying in his last meeting that Intel has more success in APAC because "those people" aren't "smart enough" to realize AMD as a more viable solution. Being Asian yourself, do you also consider that a "well-rounded" answer? wbmw

To: Ali Chen who wrote (79067)	5/2/2002 12:08:40 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 275872

Do you listen to the conference calls? I do. Either Sanders has refused to round himself out to include "technical basics" for CEOs, or he's losing it. The guy started off with a BSEE from one of the ten best universities in the country, but to this day he's very weak technically. To think that a banker's community can generate any question that Jerry could not answer is incredibly stupid. It's not the banking community that calls in with questions to the CCs, which is what I'm talking about. It's the analysts, who should know something, which I admit is debatable. However you want to judge Sanders, AMD did start off in business within a year of Intel.