SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (79069)5/2/2002 12:58:09 AM
From: YousefRespond to of 275872
 
Dan3,

Re: "It costs Intel nearly twice as much to design, build, and market a CPU as
it does AMD."

Please re-run your "snappy" analysis on the revenue side of the
equation ... comparing ASP's. Maybe then you will have a "clue" as
to why AMD is losing money and INTC is making money. <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef



To: Dan3 who wrote (79069)5/2/2002 8:07:51 AM
From: Road WalkerRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Efficiency

INTC - Revenue per employee - 319,460
AMD - Revenue per employee - 250,092
INTC - Net Income per employee - 20,887
AMD - Net Income per employee - N/A



To: Dan3 who wrote (79069)5/2/2002 10:03:22 AM
From: niceguy767Respond to of 275872
 
dan3:

"You are all refusing to face up to the fact that AMD is a lot more efficient than Intel. How many steppers are in which square feet of what plant being run by how many workers is something we aren't told by either company. Intel is very secretive about how much it must spend to make its chips. But here's what we do know:"

Nicely done, Dan3...but they don't seem capable of hearing what they don't want to hear...