Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (46690)	5/2/2002 6:50:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Yep. And those came about specifically because Poet was involved in the decision to continue to deny me access to the SMBR. For several months I left her strictly alone. Demonstrated clearly that those who claimed all sorts of idiotic things, like that I was obsessed with her, like that I couldn't leave her alone, were simply wrong. But when I sought some reciprocal benefit for complying with her wishes, she, through her cohorts, said no. So she was enjoying what she wanted, but continuing to prevent me from continuing to enjoy what I wanted. That's not equitable. So I decided that if we couldn't both have what we wanted, neither of us should. Sounds fair to me. She can go right back to gettnig what she wants if she really wants it. If she liked being left totally alone for the past several months, she can go right back to that. And she knows it. But if what she really wants is continued conflict, which appears from the circumstances to be her actual, though not her stated, goal, then that's what will happen. It's her choice.