Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (46698)	5/2/2002 8:45:29 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

ughh.. "But Laz, presumably on instructions from Poet, wanted to go further than that. That, it seems to me, was an act of inequity. The resolutions I was referring to were those offered to amend things on this thread not on SMBR. SMBR was set up when the issue was found to be a dead end issue on this thread. What Poet or Laz thought or anything that went on on SMBR became a non-Christopher matter, because SMBR was set up as an alternative to this Christopher issue.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (46698)	5/3/2002 2:10:09 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

That is not an accurate account of events.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (46698)	5/3/2002 4:55:54 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Let me add a bit to my last post. You demanded the right to QUOTE Poet's posts and reply to those quotes through a third party, and refused to extend the notoorabout to IHUB. I considered that problems on IHUB were bound to spill over onto SMBR and that was unacceptable. There was a privacy agreement about these matters. I consider that you had already violated it. Should you now desist from violating it, I will do likewise.