SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (164827)5/2/2002 10:07:08 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Kap, Re: "I happen to know that Itanic's inability to support JIT and .NET framework efficiently was one of the primary motivations behind MS's push into x86-64."

Just curious, but from where did you hear that?

wbmw



To: kapkan4u who wrote (164827)5/2/2002 11:10:34 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Itanium code can't be JIT compiled well. Heck it can't even be JID (Just in Days) compiled well. So the quote above is as absurd as it gets. Granted you don't pretend to understand the issues.

What in the world are you talking about? What does JVM have to do with JIT?

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News