SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LTK007 who wrote (60964)5/3/2002 8:31:48 AM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Futures dropping on 6% unemployment number.Max



To: LTK007 who wrote (60964)5/3/2002 9:15:18 AM
From: Boca_PETE  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99280
 
Greenspan, an economist, making stock option accounting rules - just what investors need?

money.cnn.com

IMHO what's actually needed is a better disclosure of the dilution of the earnings pool from stock issued under company stock option plans (ie. Earnings per Share with and without such share issuances). Such a disclosure would highlight the reality from company options plans - Dilution of the earnings pool over a greater number of outstanding shares. Only then will real impact of stock option compensation and the companies that over use these plans be transparent.

The optional Stock Option Expense that would be booked under current rules (SFAS 123) [ which 98% of companies choose to disclose in the footnotes to financial statements ] is a black box theoretical value that has nothing to do with company cash outflows for compensation expense. No cash or assets leave companies for stock option compensation - cash actually comes into the company when shares are issued upon option exercise. To book such an expense would understate earnings with an offset credit to capital surplus with no overall impact on stockholder equity - smoke and mirrors.

For additional explanation, see

Message 17074513

P