Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (11989)	5/3/2002 9:07:42 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Sorry, I do apologise - I had never heard of McKinney before, so didn't alert to the name when you requoted - you should have kept that bit of the article. My bad, it wasn't a gratuitous insult. I'm not sure her idiocy was worse than LaPierre's, mind... but I guess that is subjective. Whichever, neither justifies or excuses LaPierre's stance. And it is almost a definition of irrationalia. I think I remember you expressed mild displeasure with the steel tariffs... this is not really a challenging or demarcating line, however, for anyone comprehending the basic meaning of 'free trade' or 'illegal subsidy', not to mention 'protectionism'. I'd be more impressed with disagreement on something with some contentiousness, especially if such did not fall directly across RR party lines.