SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (28416)5/5/2002 11:38:52 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
whether it rises to the level of a war crime

When you look at the "Third World" peoples states that are passing resolution after resolution against Israel on any pretext, it is easy to imagine what they would do to us if they had this court available.

On a moral level, I object to a lot that the USA now does to me without my permission. I certainly don't want them to agree to open me up to charges from other countries. This type of thing leads to the "Black Helicopters" charges that the militia types holler about.

BTW, go back and make sure you read the column I posted from the German Columnist. I think it is a very fair presentation.
Message 17424923



To: JohnM who wrote (28416)5/5/2002 9:53:59 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 281500
 
Yep, just finished reading the Times this morning. We should have signed that one a long time ago. You cannot get a seriously enforceable international criminal court without US participation.

The article that I read (in the Seattle Times) said that we did sign the agreement a long time ago (jn 1996). It was never ratified by the US Congress, but the Congress traditionally never ratifies most of these anyway.

The news was that the Bush team was annoucing the "unsigning" (i.e removing the US as a signer of this War Crimes commitee) I even saw Colin Powell announce it on one of the Sunday morning shows.