SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (51239)5/5/2002 5:45:02 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 54805
 
U.S.: This Recovery Isn't Going to Stall Out

BusinessWeek Magazine: Business Outlook
By James C. Cooper & Kathleen Madigan
Saturday May 4, 2002

Business leaders and investors have a lot on their minds these days. Uncertainties over the Middle East, oil prices, and terrorism. Ongoing Enron Corp. and accounting fallout. And now, concerns over the liability of Wall Street brokerages stemming from the activities of their analysts. All this is casting a pall over how people value companies via the financial markets and how they feel about future investment decisions.

However, the latest data on the economy strongly argue that any gloomy view should not extend to assessments of the recovery. The economy grew at a robust 5.8% annual rate in the first quarter, suggesting a stunning productivity gain last quarter and an increase in profits. Moreover, inflation is a no-show, workers' buying power is up sharply, and the Federal Reserve is happy to keep monetary policy extremely stimulative.

More important, first-quarter growth in real gross domestic product was balanced between inventories and sales to consumers, businesses, government, and foreigners. A sharply slower rate of inventory liquidation created an $83 billion swing in inventories, which contributed 3.1 percentage points to GDP's 5.8% gain. Final sales added the other 2.7 points. This near-equal mix of inventories and demand is essential for a sustained upturn.

Equally critical for the outlook is that demand is spreading beyond consumers. Exports grew last quarter, tech outlays began to recover
Already in the first quarter, sectors that had been drags on GDP growth are now contributing to demand. For example, real exports rose at a 7% pace last quarter, the first increase since the summer of 2000. The gain was all in services, but exports of goods dipped only 1%, after huge losses last year, which cut a half-point from 2001's GDP growth. As the global recovery gains strength, exports will pick up further.

Overall net exports, the tally of exports minus imports, subtracted 1.2 percentage points from the quarter's GDP gain. But, again, that's an indication of the strength of demand: Domestic spending pulled in a flood of foreign-made goods last quarter. Imports surged 15%, swamping the gain in exports. Adding spending on imports back to the mix, domestic demand grew 3.7%, about the same as the fourth quarter's 3.9% pace.

SOME OF THAT INCREASED DEMAND is coming from companies. Overall business outlays for equipment and software fell 0.5% last quarter, but that reflected a 24.5% plunge in transportation equipment, mainly cars and trucks, which had been boosted in the fourth quarter by special sales incentives.

Business spending on information-processing gear, about half of the total, rose 7.5% last quarter, the first rise in more than a year. And purchases of traditional industrial machinery jumped 16%, also the first increase in a year. Corroborating these gains, first-quarter industrial output of tech equipment jumped 17%, and imports of capital goods surged 27%. Both were the largest increases in more than a year and a half.

The capital-equipment sector is in the early stages of an upturn, which will gather speed when businesses come to appreciate that demand is firming and that profits are turning around. Indeed, many companies have projects with high expected returns sitting on the drawing board, just waiting for the go-ahead.

You can't blame businesses for being cautious after one of the worst collapses in profits in the postwar era. However, the profits outlook is rapidly improving. The GDP data suggest that productivity grew at an annual rate of about 7% last quarter, after a 5.2% surge in the fourth quarter. That would be the largest two-quarter gain in nearly 20 years--and unit labor costs will post the largest two-quarter drop since then.

The result: Despite weak pricing power, profit margins are widening, and economywide earnings, measured by the Commerce Dept., will post a solid advance when the data are released on May 24. Keep in mind that the earnings of the 500 companies in Standard & Poor's stock index are not added up the same way. And while the S&P earnings are important to stock prices, they do not represent the makeup of the overall economy.

A RETURN OF CAPITAL SPENDING and foreign demand will take the pressure off consumers, who have led this recovery with a 6.1% jump in spending in the fourth quarter and a 3.5% advance in the past quarter. Households cannot maintain that pace as they deal with higher fuel prices and waning stimuli from tax cuts and mortgage refinancings.

However, consumer spending still has plenty of support, and households remain optimistic despite all the uncertainties. The Conference Board's index of consumer confidence slipped to 108.8 in April, from 110.7 in March, but it held on to nearly all of its 15.7-point jump in March. Crucially, households' assessments of job-market conditions have stopped falling.

Confidence is holding up because, despite meager job growth, workers are generally seeing big increases in the buying power of their pay. The first-quarter employment-cost index, which covers pay and benefits, grew 3.9% from a year ago. Although that pace has slowed somewhat, it far exceeds that of inflation. In fact, real wages over the past year have grown 3%, twice as fast as the pace this time last year biz.yahoo.com



To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (51239)5/5/2002 9:37:03 PM
From: chaz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Ethan...

I'm of the same mind re: Elon and you said it well. Your tag line...

("loading up [on ELON] while it's cheap" may take on new meaning within the next year or two.)

...prompts me to ask if you see anything tech that's cheap today?

Chaz

BTW: for those who wanted survey results, I can report there were eleven responses, no conclusion evident.



To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (51239)5/5/2002 11:12:16 PM
From: techreports  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
A great deal of short interest in a stock usually isn't a good sign (natch). Shorts aren't always right, but they're usually pretty smart when it comes to ganging up on richly valued stocks (according to Yahoo, ELON's PE is 100) with high aspirations.

I have been shown zero facts to prove that shorts are usually right or do more research. I've heard this many times before, but I've heard many things and usually the quiet facts totally disprove what the consensus thinking is. There are a ton of people short TTWO because some guy from the thestreet.com wrote a article about them. The stock has gone from 15 to 25. This company has a top selling video game and is very undervalued compared to their peers. BUt the shorts were just convinced the stock was headed towards 7.

Look at Rambus. That was like 50% of the float. A mutual fund manager said he was telling everyone he knew to short Rambus. You can agree or disagree on whether Rambus was been a success from a business point of view, but the company is still around and doing more in sales today than in 1999. Umm..the shorts were wrong. Now that the market has crashed, I think more dumb people have become short sellers. Chrysler is another. Everyone said they were going bankrupt. Not only did Chrysler continue to operate, but they went on to producing one of the more popular cars in the 80s. The reason shorts can be wrong like everyone else is because there is a strong tendency for humans to group in herds. They feel safety when everyone else agrees with their opinion. Whether you are a short or a long, you are human and deal with the same psychological factors as everyone else. If you want to disagree, be my guest.

Shorts are humans. The question is, do you have more faith in your abilities or in other humans that you have never met? At least I know my strengths and weaknesses. Regardless of the shorts, if your facts and reasoning is right, you'll ultimately be proved correct. Matter of fact, I want to own stock in a company I believe in with a high short interest. If I know they are wrong, the shorts will cover and I will make a huge proft. Investing in something that the consuesnus agrees with (ala JDSU in 2000 or QCOM the past two years) will not produce good returns IMO.

As for Echelon. The estimate for 2003 is $.67 which would give you a PE of around 22. That isn't bad. Tell me, how many shiny pebbles are reasonable valued on sound valuation metrics (i'm assuming the estimates are correct)? I don't think Echelon is about home automation, although that's part of the business. I think automating factories, or buildings is a market that could use Echelon's technology. I just don't understand the ROI for the consumer market. Why do I want to turn my lights on and off from my computer or cell phone? Not something the market wants right now or would pay for IMO. Ten years from now and that could be different. All too often on Wall Street, people develop models based on history. The problem is, people fall into the trap of thinking that the future will be like the past. And how likely is that? So why do humans continue to make the same mistakes. You guessed it, our stupid animal psychological instincts. We always assume things can't happen to us. It happens to other people. Psychology is what drives markets. Markets never change, because people never do. Gorillas are still companies and valuation will always matter. Now that many people are giving up on tech, we may actually be able to buy reasonable stocks. Matter of fact, I'm quite happy with this bear market and hope it continues. For example, if Qualcomm were to announce that VodaFone will adopt CDMA2000, I doubt the stock would even budge. In the past, Qualcomm would have shot up 50 points. Now the stock would probably do nothing. That's value to me. Makes investing much easier as well. Of course, I happen to think that a major European carrier switching from WCDMA to CDMA2000 as possibility the biggest news in Qualcomm history next to the Ericsson court win.



To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (51239)5/6/2002 2:14:10 AM
From: akmike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Hello ardethan,

You say: " I have to say, Echelon is one of those shiny pebbles I've never quite gotten. They have something to do with automated houses, right?"

The second sentence is accurate, I suppose, but not germane to how and why Echelon is beginning to make money at an ever-increasing rate. The company has been in business a little over 10 years, earned their first operating profit in Q4 of 2001, will be solidly profitable in 2002 and, perhaps, showing mega-growth for a long, long time.

Echelon has developed a control technology which operates under an open, interoperable system and allows communication over power lines, rf, copper pairs, and the internet. It is applicable to residential, industrial, commercial buildings,and transportation. The protocol Lonworks is becoming a de-facto worldwide standard.

Their biggest contract to date is with the ENEL, the world's largest investor-owned utility which is installing Lonworks is some 30,000,000 locations in Italy. While Lonworks allows the utility to remotely read meters, it's main benefit to ENEL is to manage the consumption of power in their grid to the extent it is like having 25% more generating capacity on-line. If the system had been installed in California, there would have been no brown-outs last year.

The customers of ENEL benefit by being able to monitor and manage their individual power consumption. (even remotely, if they desire). The system called Contatore Electronico in Italy has even inspired Merloni, a major appliance manufacturer to to introduce appliances that may be rented by the use rather than purchased.

The system that Echelon is currently testing for Kaifa in China has the potential to propel Echelon to gorilla status IMO. Echelon sells at 100 times trailing earnings which were mostly derived from interest on cash in the bank and not from company operations. Analysts are estimating .40 eps for 2002 which could well prove conservative and .70 should be in the bag for 2003 on the strength of the ENEL contract. If a Kaifa contract is announced these numbers will be marked up considerably.

Even without the China contract, Echelon is cheap at today's price. 40 or so times this year's earnings which are very visible and growing at more than 150% does seem cheap to me.
Few other companies have the visibility and prospects for growth.



To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (51239)6/1/2002 3:20:43 AM
From: pranadude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Echelon's technology is increasingly becoming the control standard in the building industry and used in factories, super markets, military, and countless other applications. Only when ENEL signed a deal to wire 27 million homes did the home market really come into play. There is good reason to believe other utilities may follow ENEL's lead, both for meter reading as well as smart appliances, security and other functions. Merloni has a washing machine and dryer that the consumer gets for free and you pay for each load you use. This is using LON technology. A few more utility deals, and you may look back and wonder why this gem didn't look more interesting while it was cheap.