SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11326)5/5/2002 11:21:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Buffett Lashes Out At Accounting Practices

By Bill Rigby
Sunday May 5, 11:07 pm Eastern Time

OMAHA, Neb. (Reuters) - Billionaire investor Warren Buffett hit out on Sunday at bad accounting practices and huge stock option plans for greedy CEOs, but forecast no effective changes in the rules to curb the problems.

"The basic problem is that auditors feel they are working for management, not shareholders," said Buffett, talking about ways to improve the accounting industry after the collapse of energy trader Enron Corp.

Buffett was speaking at a media conference in his home town of Omaha, Nebraska, the day after his Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s annual meeting.

Auditors must feel "more fearful of going along with management than not going along with management," Buffett said, arguing that for many years auditors have helped U.S. corporations make their results look more impressive.

U.S. regulators are currently looking at ways of improving the standards of audits, but no firm measures have been imposed. Buffett said he was pessimistic that any effective measures would be taken soon.

Separating consulting and audit work, or revolving auditors of companies to ensure no auditor gets too cozy with management, will not solve any problems, Buffett said, dismissing two measures being considered.

"Other big name auditors would have let the same things slip by," Buffett said, commenting on auditor Arthur Andersen's work with Enron, suggesting the malaise is industry-wide.

Andersen faces a criminal trial starting this week, accused of obstruction of justice by destroying thousands of Enron audit records while the energy trader's accounting was under investigation.

Enron was a "grotesque outbreak," Buffett said, but not the only case of bad accounting in the United States.

Buffett also attacked American CEOs' huge pay packages, in particular stock-option grants, which in many cases hurt firms and their investors by diluting stock already on issue.

"Essentially CEOs bargain with themselves" over pay, said Buffett, who has sat on several compensation boards of firms he owns or invests in. "They don't turn into bar-room brawls."

Buffett said he has no objection to stock options in principle, but many U.S. firms abuse then by not accounting for them as an expense, or setting the option price so low that managers do not have to achieve much to make huge profits.

"Something must be done about it," said Buffett, who supports a push by Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan to get companies to account for stock options as an expense.

When they don't, it overstates a company's profits and dilutes shareholders' investments, Buffett and long-time business partner Charlie Munger said.

"Over time it adds up, giving away one to two percent of the company every year," Munger said, attacking firms which dole out large amounts of stock through cheap options.

Berkshire itself does not give out stocks or options as compensation, but Buffett said whoever succeeds him at the head of Berkshire may well get an option package. "But it would be constructed different from most," he added.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11326)5/6/2002 2:05:05 AM
From: Mark Fowler  Respond to of 57684
 
siliconinvestor.com

I like Europe for growth, a revival of the Roman Empire.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11326)5/6/2002 12:35:38 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Dow Jones Newswires on being a CEO...

NEW YORK (Dow Jones) Being a chief executive officer sure isn't what it used to be. Good thing, too. The way things used to be wasn't good for anyone except the CEO, his ego and his wallet.

Cast your mind back to those long ago days of the late 1990s, when the cult of the CEO ruled the earth. CEOs were rock stars then, their pictures on every magazine cover and their names on every investor's lips. They were the Great Men (and Women) whose ambition, vision and sheer aggressiveness would inevitably lead their companies to great things, with shareholders reaping the benefits.

Does anyone need to be reminded that it hasn't turned out that way?

What we've seen instead, as the economy and market did a nosedive that they still haven't come out of fully, is that CEOs have gone from lionized captains of industry to Rodney Dangerfield. The economic slide has exposed them; they've lost their special aura of success, of being winners. An aura, it's become apparent, that many of them never really deserved to begin with.

This week brought the latest prominent example. Bernie Ebbers, he of the avalanche of acquisitions, resigned from WorldCom Inc. (WCOM) amid a faltering business, a plunging stock price and a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of the company. Ebbers, it turns out, was so shrewd and savvy that he now owes his former company $366 million the result of loans that WorldCom granted to him so he wouldn't have to sell his WorldCom stock to cover margin calls as the stock plummeted.

At least Ebbers held onto his stock. Gary Winnick, the chairman of Global Crossing Ltd. (GBLXQ), reaped about $600 million from selling shares in the company before it filed for bankruptcy in January. Global Crossing, like Worldcom a telecommunications company whose ambition outstripped its resources, is also under SEC investigation.

More examples:

The board of Kmart Corp. (KM), which is also in Chapter 11, said it's "reviewing the stewardship" of the company by former CEO Charles Conaway and other former senior executives over potential wrongdoing.

The SEC is attempting to hold CEOs and other top executives of companies personally responsible for accounting irregularities at the companies. The commission has already sued Waste Management Inc.'s (WMI) former chairman, its exCEO and other senior officials, and the Wall Street Journal reported last month that the SEC had notified Xerox Corp.'s (XRX) former chairman and ex-chief financial officer that they could face civil charges also.

Investor unrest about exorbitant executive pay packages in the face of market declines appears to be growing. No wonder: While CEO salary and bonuses declined a median 2.8% last year at 350 major companies, according to a study that Mercer Human Resources Consulting did for the Wall Street Journal, the median compensation was still $1.6 million and the decline doesn't approach the median 17.8% tumble that those companies' earnings took, according to the study.

Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling. Enron Corp. (ENRNQ). Enough said. Ditto for the hordes of failed CEOs of failed Internet companies.

Even Jack Welch, the sainted former CEO of General Electric Co. (GE), doesn't escape this trend. It wasn't long after Welch retired a hero that nagging questions about GE's blackbox accounting and potential earnings management came to the fore. While Welch has escaped direct criticism, it's a fair supposition that the GE practices that are under the market's scrutiny didn't just suddenly start under his successor. (And that's aside from the embarrassing revelation of Welch's extramarital relationship with a now-former Harvard Business Review editor.)

The common thread running through all these examples is that the pedestal is gone. No longer are CEOs being treated as a special, elite class whose every utterance is golden and whose brilliance and expertise are indispensable to their companies. They're people. They're fallible, and sometimes they do bad things. And now, finally, they're being held accountable, by investors, boards and regulators.

That's all to the good, because most CEOs never deserved the adulation they got in the first place. The cult of the CEO flourished during a time when a rising economic tide was lifting all boats, and a market suffering from temporary insanity was throwing money at anything that moved. With that sort of help to work with, a chimp in the CEO's suite could have managed some of these companies to big gains. As a result, CEOs were able to take credit for successes that often had little to do with their own ability or expertise and investors bought it.

It's different now. The new paradigm for how CEOs are going to be treated in the future may be HewlettPackard Co.'s (HWP) Carly Fiorina, who faced intense criticism and resistance over her effort to have HP take over Compaq Computer Corp. (CPQ). That the effort ultimately was successful isn't the point here; Fiorina's experience shows that CEOs aren't going to get the benefit of the doubt anymore. They can't expect everyone to simply bow before their vision; they're going to have to sell their board, their investors and the market on what they're planning. And if there's disagreement, the CEOs had better be ready for a rough ride.

With the boom gone, in fact, we're in the kind of situation that may provide a better gauge of who's a good CEO and who isn't. Now, CEOs actually have to manage effectively to produce results for their shareholders, instead of relying on an overheated market to do it. Once again, good business decisions and sound leadership are what's important, not flash and braggadocio and aggressive acquisitions.

Take PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Both posted first quarter earnings that grew smartly from a year ago and beat Wall Street estimates, at a time when earnings are down sharply from a year ago. And both have stocks that have posted gains this year in a market that's trended lower. That's good work by anyone's measure.

Don't know who their CEOs are? Maybe there's a lesson there. (Steven Reinemund is CEO of PepsiCo; William Weldon is J&J's CEO, replacing the just retired Ralph Larsen.)

The cult of indiscriminate CEO adulation is dead. Long live smart, capable management.

Michael Rapoport, Dow Jones Newswires, 2019385976, michael.rapoport@dowjones.com

(END) DOW JONES NEWS 05/06/02

09:12 AM



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11326)5/6/2002 2:15:30 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 57684
 
Are you in the camp that believes the USD is the bulk of the problem? Because if so then theres no point in watching individual stocks at all. But weren't we in that position (declining US dollar) thoughout some tech bullish periods- early 90s maybe? (don't remember)

BTW what exactly is a "secular bear mkt" or secular bull.
L