Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (164132)	5/6/2002 4:25:44 PM
From: Tommaso	Respond to of 436258

fun: kitco.com

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (164132)	5/6/2002 4:31:51 PM
From: Earlie	Respond to of 436258

Patron: I've been eyeballing that situation too. I don't think any of us will wander far from the screens tomorrow. (g) Best, Earlie

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (164132)	5/6/2002 4:55:55 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

well that would be a myth and we all know by now i hope that myths are just that... hail to AG! let us bow before the mighty one....

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (164132)	5/6/2002 5:05:10 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

>>if we don't get an immediate reversal tomorrow, << Whaddya mean, if?? <ng>

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (164132)	5/6/2002 5:55:11 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

tee he he he >> Doody at Gold Stock Analyst puts the negative swing of the company's hedge book at $507 million. "This swing far offsets the net profits earned of $46 million in the first quarter of 2002 plus the $66 million in the third quarter of 2001 plus the $82 million in the fourth quarter of 2001. The net is a loss of $313 million." In a conference call last week, Barrick's top executives assured Wall Street analysts, who asked several questions about the company's gold-hedging, that they were monitoring the situation. Yet some observers are not convinced. "The sensitivity of the derivative portfolio now stands at about $21 million an ounce," says Douglas Pollitt at Pollitt & Co. in Toronto. "Each $1 an ounce upward move in the gold price sees the mark-to-market (of Barrick's derivative contracts) drop by about $21 million. At $350 an ounce, the mark-to-market would be over $1 billion in the red." Gold prices this year have risen to $312 an ounce from $270 at the start of January. (See more.) Pollitt calculates the notional value of Barrick's spot-deferred contracts at 18 million ounces. "Add to this another 5 million in written call options, (which the company now calls 'variable priced sales contracts'), and, one way or another, the company is short about 23 million ounces of gold. This is a fantastic number and begs the question: Could Barrick cover even if they wanted to?" <<