SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (83142)5/6/2002 8:16:26 PM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
I think it will take years...
I think the generals ...err General Electric
and Microsoft...need to go down...



To: Rob S. who wrote (83142)5/6/2002 8:25:05 PM
From: Hawk  Respond to of 99985
 
I think that if that the big boys are punished, they will punish the small investor as a scapegoat for ruining their cozy business. How will they do this, by driving stock prices down. They can make plenty of money shorting just as going long. I'm a little a bit sanguine about the boys on Wall street.

H.



To: Rob S. who wrote (83142)5/7/2002 5:48:24 PM
From: CF Rebel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Hi Rob,

I really wonder if very many individual shareholders care about what corporate managers are doing. I don't know of any shareholders rights organizations extant (although I know that T. Boone Pickens used to have one some years ago). There isn't even a thread dedicated to such on SI.

Your reference to interlocking boards of directors, supposedly for the purpose of cross-pollenization of ideas, seems more for the purpose of self-enrichment through salary/bonus and option-awarding. They continue the practice of remuneration inflation. These directors and corporate managers work for themselves far more than the "owners." These folks are members of what I refer to as "The Club." Get an MBA, suck your way to the top echelons, become a member that finds the holy grail: wealth less through hard work for a commensurate salary, and more by a different kind of corporate raiding.

The worst concept coming from this is that so many of these CEO-type of guns-for-hire stick around for not very long, only long enough to self-enrich and bail. And much of what they institute is high-risk business practice (ill-conceived mergers, selling of crucial assets, etc.) and they essentially bet the company with no risk of financial loss themselves (they just get less than they would have if the bet(s) paid off. Many companies are used as casinos by these high-rollers, using OPM.

I think that options grants should be outlawed universally and warrants based on current share price (without any future repricing) be the reward for good performance. Until these bastards put their own capital on the line, I'm convinced that they won't remember or even care who they're working for.

There are many other things that get my goat but this is chief among them.

CF Rebel



To: Rob S. who wrote (83142)5/8/2002 5:25:16 PM
From: Patrice Gigahurtz  Respond to of 99985
 
The Feds are moving on this issue as we speak. They have the various financial(s) in their site; nobodys off limits. The moral fiber of the entire stock transaction biz is in dire need of Fed action to restore confidence in the markets. Too bad this didn't happen earlier (why didn't it ?).