Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dhellman who wrote (79591)	5/6/2002 10:14:54 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 275872

dhellman, Re: "great questions Yousef, unfortunately I don't think Hector is on this tech tour ..." Actually, you might get a "real/straight" answer from someone other than Hector. This is a "tech tour", right ... These are "tech questions". I would hope someone could answer them ... Maybe that's part of AMD's problem. Make It So, Yousef

To: dhellman who wrote (79591)	5/6/2002 10:38:38 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 275872

great questions Yousef, unfortunately I don't think Hector is on this tech tour but hey, you don't know if you don't ask Aside from the obvious questions, (if you have such great yields, why can't you ship any product?) how about asking this one: Seeing as AMD is falling farther and father behind Intel in performance and at a faster and faster rate, and considering that you have always said that Quanithurtz is meant to compare AMD processors to AMD processors, not Intel, why should we think that a 3400+ Hammer will be competitive with a 3GHz+ Northwood, muchless an even faster Prescott? Please define what you mean by faster. Compared to what? My what measure? Please be specific. EP