Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (85177)	5/6/2002 11:21:48 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116837

You(of all people) didn't find that relevant enough to post in full? Exactly where do you get off? Is this not the exact basis of the entire GATA discussion? Oh, sorry, I got it, you're only telling me that which I should post & the way in which it should be posted because I beat you to the punch.... Tell you what, Doug, PM each morning with those things you wish to post & I'll leave it to your verbose tripe. You do understand the concept of PM, right - Doug?

To: d:oug who wrote (85177)	5/7/2002 12:17:50 AM
From: marek_wojna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116837

<<Will Barrick cover a short, 23 million ounces of gold?>> Doug, From technical point of view I don't know if ABX will be able to cover it. From propaganda in Canadian medias ABX is treated with the same love affection as Nortel was treated on the way up. Volumes ABX is trading don't tell me investors have too much sentiment for this company. Maybe they have learned lesson not to trust the media. <<Derivatives may be the real bomb>> W. Buffet is at least two years behind You and GATA, as I remember your posts regarding derivatives danger from those times. Kind regards Marek