Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (253349)	5/7/2002 3:05:29 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Certainly there is no shortage of addictions in this country, but if more recreational drugs were legalized there is no question that there would be companies that would ruthlessly and legally promote their use. * * *

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (253349)	5/7/2002 3:22:19 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"But the illegals (drugs)? No, they are not... at least their consumption is not responsible for higher fatalities then guns." I noticed you put a condition on this statement. So I can understand your post better, do you feel that someone being shot and killed over a drug deal, or someone shooting someone because they are high on drugs are drug related deaths or are the guns "responsible"? Your statement above makes it look like you believe the guns are responsible, which does not make sense to me.