SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (12359)5/7/2002 3:06:45 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 21057
 
I think you have hit on the key issue. I do not think, however, that most people have registered the probable effects of spilling the coffee on their skin. Too hot to drink is not the same as causing third degree burns on ones thigh. The mouth is assumed to be tender. Thus, it is equivocal: did she knowingly assume the risk when settling the coffee on her lap, or was the company negligent because it served coffee so hot, or failed to warn? The jury would be likely to rely on its own sense of the matter.........



To: one_less who wrote (12359)5/7/2002 6:32:06 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
<<Is it reasonable to assume that people who order coffee know that it is served piping hot? >>

I have made it a lifetime rule that anything possibly damaging never gets near my crotch.