SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (63255)5/7/2002 5:48:01 PM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
I have updated the header post on the "Nasdaq 100 Analysis" thread.

It is showing forward PE, PS and growth rates for 60 of the Nasdaq 100 stocks, representing about 88% of the total weighting of that index.

The extra 20 stocks added since the last update include members of "The Q" and other stocks you like to trade - BRCM, BRCD, BEAS, CHKP

Subject 51697



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (63255)5/7/2002 5:53:14 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
17:50 ET QLogic guides higher for June qtr (QLGC) 38.26 -3.74: -- Update -- On call, says it expects overall revenues in fiscal Q1 (Jun) to be up 3-8% on a sequential basis... That implies revenues in the range of $95.07-$99.68 mln (Multex consensus is $92.26 mln)... Separately, expects fiscal Q1 pro forma EPS of $0.20-0.24 (consensus $0.21)... QLGC +3.49 at 41.75



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (63255)5/7/2002 5:56:58 PM
From: hjz  Respond to of 99280
 
I think that is a good projection for the NASDAQ but with individual stocks, I think the potential is more like 20 or 30 % upside move. CSCO is up almost 15 % in just one after hours move and QLGC is up almost 10 % in after hours. Those are very significant moves and if you remember in October ( on the 3rd ) of last year it was positive comments from CSCO that signaled the bottom in the market. Is history repeating itself ?

HJ



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (63255)5/7/2002 5:58:43 PM
From: jjstingray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
Zeev, you jumping on the train here or waiting for the morning swoon down?



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (63255)5/7/2002 6:27:10 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Note that the Nasdaq 100 came within 50 points of the September 11 lows and actually tested the 2nd lowest close of the Nasdaq 100 on 9/26, a retest of the 9/21 lows at 1143.48. I am not sure why people pay so much attention to the Compx and use it as a tech bellweather. The Nasdaq 100 is much closer to reality. the Compx has been propped up by financials etc. that have nothing to do with the health of techland.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News