Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (12386)	5/7/2002 6:56:53 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Respond to of 21057

Well, I'm probably not as suspicious as you are... The main reason is that I don't see what would be accomplished by getting someone suspended for 15 days. It's not exactly some kind of victory, especially if you don't even get "credit" for it. 15 days will pass soon enough, and then what? Everybody, including Poet, will be back posting ... and we will no doubt still be talking about this same subject. And everything else will be as it was. I truly don't think Poet was singled out. I think SI would suspend anyone for two aliases. I was accused by SI of the same offense once and threatened with suspension, because of a registration mix-up, which I was able to straighten out. Someone may have turned her in, although we don't know that for sure, and whoever did could have been mad at her for some reason ... but in the end, Poet herself is to blame for what happened to her.