Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (253471)	5/7/2002 6:40:22 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Whats your view about companies that are located in Ohio but incorporate in Delaware?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (253471)	5/7/2002 6:52:30 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

"Get off the "Is it legal?" schtick and start asking yourself an even more important question: "Is it right?"" I'm not enough of a tax expert to know the answer to the "is it right?" question. I have a corporation and it pays taxes, and I pay personal taxes. I pay myself as much as I can so I don't pay taxes twice, although I would like to leave more cash in the company. Would you do that? Is that unpatriotic? Seems that if a corporation is in place to make money and grow, then the tax money will show up in salaries of the employees. When you provide a dis-incentive to a person or to a corporation they will do what they can to eliminate it. Not sure your model of taxing corporations is a good one. Have a feeling it is not. Let's tax all people equitably with the lowest tax rate possible so everyone pays their fair share. That seems like the fair thing to do. To many people (you included) that know just where to go to get this money in the "fairest" way, as long as its not from them.