Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (79666)	5/7/2002 8:11:10 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 275872

Elmer, AMD on the otherhand, is flatout lying and wide open to a class action suit. The charlatans would rather go after deep companies like Intel, which is probably why Intel is a helluva lot more careful in what they say than AMD. That may change with Hector in charge though, if he can find a big enough sock to shove in Sanders' mouth. Tony

To: Elmer who wrote (79666)	5/7/2002 8:28:06 PM
From: SteveC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Okay, Elmer, we can share in something positive for a moment. The after hours market loves Cisco's report. Afterhours quotes: CSCO +1.72 AMD +.34 INTC +.80 SUNW +.35

To: Elmer who wrote (79666)	5/7/2002 9:39:02 PM
From: fyodor_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer: Intel never had a "botched gate fiasco" Are you saying that Intel's yields and/or bin splits did not go straight to hell along with the introduction of infamous notched gate? "World Class Yields" are clearly defineable and AMD clearly fell way short. AMD may have lied on this issue. Another explanation (that fits the "World Class Yields" claim) is that the Tbred design itself was botched. Or perhaps the bin splits were simply extremely poor (which could also be an indication of a poor processor design). Yields could be just fine and dandy, but if what you're yielding is garbage… -fyo