SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ask DrBob -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (59079)5/8/2002 11:35:55 AM
From: heehee1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 100058
 
Louis... <short squeeze>

No kidding, look at BRCD.. Up 25% on CSCO earnings. UB



To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (59079)5/8/2002 11:45:21 AM
From: stan_hughes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 100058
 
LVL - Yes, many a pair of jockeys are currently feeling like an undersized thong right now. But this would really only apply to those who were late to the bear costume party, we are still in the basement relatively speaking.

The 1100 area (also the bottom of mini-downleg #1) seems neighborhoodish enough to me for now, although SPX has the February bottom resistance in the 1080 area to contend with.

Another thought, however premature, should we reset back to 1100 - the first two SPX down legs were equidistant 75+- drops, and Momma always told me good things come in threes.

Haven't really got a firm enough handle on the broader implications of that yet. 1025 SPX at the end of May would confirm the long term break and open up a very large can of worms, with prints a lot lower than 1025 baked in. All moot however if the triad downleg pattern never completes.

Gold rally and market crash, or gold bust and market rally? Where's that Ouija board?



To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (59079)5/8/2002 11:48:18 AM
From: stats77  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 100058
 
Louis; short squeeze???eom