Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff who wrote (63761)	5/8/2002 11:34:34 AM
From: thesilenttype	Respond to of 99280

Jeff,YOU just hit a home run with that post,bud.I agree 100%.

To: Jeff who wrote (63761)	5/8/2002 11:35:47 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Respond to of 99280

this isn't a market of fundamentals It (almost) never is.

To: Jeff who wrote (63761)	5/8/2002 11:53:28 AM
From: jjstingray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Great response. The point I made to Justa, this just happened a month ago. Pull up a chart, the exact same thing happened. Now the question is, will people learn from it or buy like crazy only to see the bottom fall out again.

To: Jeff who wrote (63761)	5/8/2002 12:05:29 PM
From: KevinMark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

>>>Today I finally gathered enough data to work out the PE and PS values for the top 60 NDX stocks and the weighted average PS is only 3.89 I had expected it to be higher and am thus tempering my valuation-based bearish stance on the NDX 100 (although I am still moderately bearish for other reasons). <<< Thanks to Steve for that analysis. If that doesn't scare the bears, not sure what will. Message 17437338 Revenues are only going to increase from these levels(hence QLGC), and earnings will improve as cost cutting measures begin to take place, therefore lowering PE's. The glass is either half full or half empty. It's half full for me.