Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.B. Cooper who wrote (38479)	5/8/2002 4:45:07 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 209892

total joke, trying to swing on Chambers coat tails -- it'll never happen.

To: D.B. Cooper who wrote (38479)	5/8/2002 5:04:33 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

I'm sure that didn't hurt, but in reality what he said is more or less in line with existing estimates (especially the "revenue over 950 million", 'cause current street estimates put NTAP's 2003 revs at 976 million on average: biz.yahoo.com Corporate spending "stabilizing" doesn't mean much except that it isn't going down. I have no bone to pick with NTAP (or any of the other SAN companies for that matter), except to note that they are trading NOW at 65X 2003 earnings (which already take into account all the good stuff the CEO said today). For that to be a good investment requires they have all kinds of good news appear that isn't on the horizon now. OTOH, what DID juice the stock TODAY was the combination of QLGC's reasonably bland report yesterday, coupled with a 9+ percent short interest. Potent fuel indeed when you're already oversold...