Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (85263)	5/8/2002 11:19:57 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116822

Msg from gold_tutor "... Who gives a rat's ass [on] GPM..." Message from gold_tutor ... hell is your "she's also been wrong" comeback ... [who] gives a rat's ass [about] 100% accurate,,, [end.] Golly G Good'ism times 37, The above words from one that refuses to acknowledge any such not being 100% accurate, and those times when the facts speak for themselves, and not for your words, well then its a spin cycle extraordinary leaving everyone to not cycle it back to you. Lets see, price of gold broke over $300 and Gata Bill spoke to identify and give credit to his Gata Army for this happening, upon sandwhich you Click'ed "Rather be wrong than admit..." telling us price of gold WILL fall below $300 aSoon, and thus making your 100% accurate message aTruTh about GATA. ok, Please tell us when price of gold will fall below $300 as based on your recent posts it should have already done so. But then, just mayB your message to longone was really not about what you posted about, but a message inside a message needing no reading between the lines, as the lines speak clear. a.k.a. From: gold_tutor May 8, 2002 "... courageous female analyst... later labelled by jealous males as a bitch... " [end.] as, Golly everyone makes mistakes, and sometimes will even do that backwards Walk to support a Talk of unTruTh. so, Might this be your way to be wrong without obtaining any label of making a mistake, as the means was what was important, not the end. Just wondering, and also wondering why you need another backwards Walk to undo that backwards Walk to support a Talk of unTruTh. 4Sure E.C. might find it of interest in aSense if i expanded upon that negative of a negative not equal to an unWalk of an unWalk, as one is an addition for a cancel, and the other gets an increase in the negative direction. ak