SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (29031)5/9/2002 12:11:20 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 281500
 
This seems a little odd, as I thought Woolsey was in the Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld camp. Also a little ironic, given Safire's frequent role as a leak conduit. Who knows. After reading Safire's column, I went off to the Edward Jay Epstein site and found this: edwardjayepstein.com

Conspiracy theorists will find that site entertaining for other reasons. The Angleton saga is quite a story, and anybody in a position to tease the truth out of that one probably would never state it publicly, on penalty of extreme prejudice.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (29031)5/9/2002 9:48:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If the report proves accurate, a connection would exist between Al Qaeda's murder of 3,000 Americans and Iraq's Saddam. That would clearly be a casus belli, calling for our immediate military response, separate from the need to stop a demonstrated mass killer from acquiring nuclear and germ weapons.

Errr, what?

Assuming, for the sake of the argument, that Atta did in fact meet with Ahmed el-Ani, this is a "casus belli"?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News