SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (15526)5/9/2002 4:29:24 PM
From: hdl  Respond to of 27666
 
muslims struck wtc and pentagon, indian legislature,hindus india, russians, french in pakistan, jews in israel and elsewhere, church of nativity, chinese in south east asia, christians in africa, blacks in africa. they may end up with many retaliating.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (15526)5/9/2002 8:20:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27666
 
Hence dealing with him is different from dealing with cavemen

If it weren't, Sharon would have blasted him in 1982, and the world would be a better place.

As I said that if he is inciting/acquiescing to terrorism, then he is answerable to the world and will be pressured by the world community to cease and desist from such acts

To quote Blackadder, "I'm glad I wore my corset because I think my sides have split". ROFLMAO. The world community is falling all over itself to act as apologists for Palestinian suicide bombers, because a) it's fashionable to hate Israel, particularly on the left, b) Europe has post-colonial guilt, c) Europe has left-over Marxist sympathy for the underdog, which used to be Israel but after 1967 switched to the poor, poor Palestinians, d) Europe needs oil, e) Europe is terrified of its own unassimilated Arab/Muslim populations, and f) Europe hopes to avoid suicide bombers in its own back yard by following the tried-but-untrue policy of appeasement.

As for Clausewitz, he wrote On War amazon.com