SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (254381)5/12/2002 1:18:18 AM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Told you the following was coming. Here is the real definition of progressive buried in this article.

an article from The
Washington Times.

Can someone tell me why we are a member of the UN. Why are
MY tax dollars going there?

-----------------------------------------------------------

CHILD SEX BOOK GIVEN OUT AT U.N. SUMMIT

George Archibald
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

-----------------------------------------------------------

NEW YORK — A UNICEF-funded book being passed out at the
United Nations Child Summit encourages children to engage in
sexual activities with other minors and with homosexuals and
animals.

As the delegations to the summit remain deadlocked on
abortion, international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
that support the U.S. delegation's anti-abortion stance
circulated copies of pages from a UNICEF-funded book given
to delegates from Latin America that promotes sexual
activity and abortion among teens in their countries.

"Reproductive health includes the following components:
Counseling on sexuality, pregnancy, methods of
contraception, abortion, infertility, infections and
diseases," says the Spanish-language book, whose title
translates to "Theoretic Elements for Working with Mothers
and Pregnant Teens."

An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N.
Children's Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and
teens: "Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure:
1. Masturbation. 2. Sexual relations with a partner —
whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3. A sexual
response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals,
minors, non-consenting persons."

The book, which was distributed by the Mexican government
with U.N. funding, suggests lesbian sex as an acceptable
alternative for girls.

"Sexual relations with a partner: Here we should insist
there is no ideal or perfect relations between two or
several people," the book says. "The one that gives us the
most satisfaction and that which is adopted to our way of
being and the style of life we have chosen. This is why we
encounter many differences among women. Some women like to
have relations with men. And others with another woman."

UNICEF spokesman Alfred Ironside acknowledged U.N. funding
for the book, but said it was produced by the Mexican
government in 1999 and pulled from circulation "when the
content was more carefully reviewed."

Mr. Ironside said he did not know how many of the books were
circulated. "A very small number were produced — fewer than
a thousand," he said. "It was pulled out of circulation when
the content was more carefully reviewed."

"That book was a product of the Mexican government,
supported by UNICEF financially as part of UNICEF's support
to the Mexican government," Mr. Ironside said.

"We do everything we do in full agreement with the
governments we support. We do not operate independently," he
said.

He said the book was "intended as a training manual for
people working with adolescent women to prevent teen
pregnancy. That publication was a compilation of articles
by different contributors and has a very clear disclaimer in
the front that the views of the writers do not necessarily
reflect the views of the United Nations."

The workshop book is being passed out by anti-abortion NGOs
to persuade delegates from the large Latin American bloc of
countries called the Rio Group to support the U.S. proposal
to remove ambiguous language from the child-summit action
document, which has been used in the past by U.N. agencies
to promote abortion.

Delegations to the U.N. Child Summit remained deadlocked
yesterday in closed-door negotiations over abortion and
other hot-button issues that have held up final agreement on
a U.N. action agenda to protect the world's children.

The U.S. delegation, praised by pro-family groups for
standing firm to ensure the agenda does not sanction
continued U.N. promotion of abortions, was attacked by NGO
critics for a second day at an afternoon briefing, NGO
members at the meeting said.

Douglas Sylva, an official with the Catholic Family and
Human Rights Institute, called the briefing "an NGO feeding
frenzy," in which the United States was attacked for its
position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict; arms sales to
allies; the Bush administration's support of capital
punishment; and U.S. failure to ratify the U.N. Convention
on the Rights of the Child.

"The fact that the United States is the only country besides
Somalia that has not ratified [the] child's rights
[convention] is shocking," said Paula Daeppen, director in
Zurich for the Federation of American Women's Clubs
Overseas.

"We're supposed to be a moral leader of the world and child
friendly," she said.

Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, Texas Democrat, told the meeting
she applauded the administration's work to protect children
from pornography, exploitation and "child soldiering." But
she said she disagreed with the U.S. delegation on some
issues.

"There needs to be flexibility on life," she said — an
apparent reference to the administration's strong
anti-abortion stance. A person close to the congresswoman,
who asked to remain anonymous, said her remarks were
intended to urge "more flexibility on family planning."

Abortion is not mentioned directly in the draft child-summit
document, but UNICEF, which organized the 187-country
special session of the General Assembly, and the U.N. Fund
for Population Activities, interpret the ambiguous phrase
"reproductive health services" to include abortion.

A senior Canadian negotiator told delegates in earlier
preparatory meetings that the term includes abortion,
prompting the Bush administration to start pushing for the
alternate term "reproductive health care."

European countries, with the exception of Spain, along with
Canada, Japan and New Zealand oppose the U.S. position.
Muslim nations and some African countries also support the
United States.

The Rio Group, whose delegations say their predominantly
Catholic populations don't condone abortion, said there is
no danger the term "reproductive health services" will be
used to promote abortions in Latin America.