SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sharck who wrote (37690)5/12/2002 1:26:19 PM
From: Sharck  Respond to of 37746
 
JBin PAs Lie NUMBER 2:

JBSCUMBAG said that no one was discussing our site prior to my response to the OVER float question, dated Apr 26.

Well guess again Scumbag, this is a small sample of posts just one day before I answered Mongos question LOL:

Epilogue to WOW gossip
By: antiquites 25-Apr-02 10:20 AM



Forgot to mention this earlier...

Da room on Paltalk with OJ, Bruce, Christine, John (sharkie) and Lee Kramer is free til May 1.

Current room members can sign up prior to May 1 for $150/month and new members on May 1 will be charged $200.

Trading seminars will be given for $750 for 10 total hours with each session being 2 hours.

The above information was received via email this morning and as I have not been in da room at all, I can only assume there was such an outcry they decided to give the fee info prior to your getting your credit card number and lower them as well.

I naturally will not be affording myself of their services.

I always wonder if these people have a real business and are licensed with their local towns/states and pay license fees like we do and/or incorporated like we are and pay annual filing fees on that as wella nd file Federal and State returns.....or, if one day they say, let's go into da trading biz and open an e-room and make lots of money! No matter, just my random musings while waiting for DA MARKET to decide what it is going to do.

BTW, I can call da market as well as they can on a second by second basis just using L2....which only goes to show there is not much expertise required as I am NOT such a pro!

Regards from your up-to-the-minute on current paltalk pay-for-trade rooms reporter,

Linda

OT/ Linda....da room
By: herry iball 25-Apr-02 10:26 AM



hey ho....I didn't know you were there, lol.

I've had it on in the background since the fall. Bruce makes some decent swing trade calls, but I agree completely with your sentiments.

Christine (ie BT) is actually way off on some of her futures commentary (I trade the e-minis so I cringe at times when she starts saying we're going up going up....and all I see is a bear flag or rising wedge to short into).

And a much as I like Lee as a person, his voice could put a METH addict to sleep.

Frankly, If I was going to pay for a room I'd go with Tereso Lo or Linda Rathske first.

Frankly, I think I'd rather just put on some good blues or the Dead and drown out the commentary. Thanks for the heads up though, I need to check my email.

Regards,
Vlad
OT - Totally agree. I have been doing exponentially better since tuning out da experts in da room:) Sometimes a crutch can be debilitating:)

Oh wow, ANT! Too bad I'm only holding 1/2 position, had to sell some at a slight profit the other day before taking the children to the dentist. I was just telling hubby that was a verrrry expensive dental visit:(

Regards,

Sue
OT/Vlad
By: antiquites 25-Apr-02 11:31 AM



Nice choice for background.....the music, not da room. Da room just distraction and muddies your thinking.

A good concept these rooms; but I have never seen any room that I would pay for (and that includes Teresa's room as she is too, too precise and that drives me crazy) and they seem to rely as much on the paying members to pull part of the weight in the room. I have this feeling that if I am going to pay, then I want them to make explicit calls with entries and exits and be right at least 50% of the time. Asking a lot I know. I just like sharing trading ideas and taking responsibility for our own trades...good or bad.

Regards,

Linda
OT: Linda
By: herry iball 25-Apr-02 11:43 AM



Yup.

I tried several rooms in the past couple years.....I was in OJ's room for a month back when it was a pay room (about 2 years ago)

Also tried (gasp) the pristine room....boy was THAT a joke. That was just before JENNA got run off of SI for posting only the good trades, lol.

Sure, you make 25 calls in the morning and one of them is bound to make a buck or two, lol.

Ah yes, the responsibility issue. The hardest thing to accept by people who 'rely' on rooms. Much finger pointing by rarely pointed at themselves.

Thought about Teresa's room merely to get some pointers on trading futures as that is her forte. (little things that futures traders pivot off of, such as the 40ema15, or making sure one uses 200sma as well as ema on the 5 minute charts.

But I doubt the temptation will actually resolve into action for me. <gg>

Cheers.
paying rooms
By: bocor 25-Apr-02 12:18 PM



Linda, if that is what you want, only a 50% return on the specific calls, then go to Tony's site and ONLY trade Tony's calls. It will cost you $600 or so a month, but his calls are for the most part stellar. He gets a wild hair now and then, but much lkess than 50% of the time.
But then, why pay anything when Tom has a record of at least 50% and by my non-mathematical mind much better than 50%?
bocor
By: antiquites 25-Apr-02 12:32 PM



I'm not paying anyone when my own calls are absolutely on target......now don't get in an uproar!

Have you ever heard the expression, I never lose anything...just misplace things.

Well in the same vein, I have perfect calls, it is just my TIMING is off a lot. <g>

My mistakes, my wins....my fault either way. So,Tony (whoever he is) is not for me.

I think our leader here (TOM) is superior to none.

Regards,

Linda

Regar
LOL---Just realized what I wrote ---Tom
By: antiquites 25-Apr-02 12:37 PM



Our leader TOM is inferior to none.........

Not, superior to none!

Surprised no one yelled at me for that one.

Regards from inferior,

Linda