To: The Philosopher who wrote (47003 ) 5/12/2002 11:02:18 PM From: E Read Replies (4) | Respond to What actually happened is that you said you didn't turn Poet in and I made the point (one you still seem peculiarly incapable of grasping) that if, hypothetically, you had said, to, say, Dithers, something like, "Gee, Poet complains that the TOU regarding harassment aren't enforced, but she violated the TOU herself by having a second accn't under the name of apply_liberally!"... If that had happened, you would be able to say that you "had nothing to do with" turning Poet in, and yet you would have been--ever so innocently-- the supplier of the information that Dithers, in this example, used to get Poet suspended.I don't care. It's no big deal. Poet violated the TOU by setting up that accn't, and even though it was a year ago, she's doin' the time for the crime, and putting the time to good use. Also, after you said that I knew about Poet's other accounts, I told you that I didn't. But you continued to claim that I did. So when Poet gets back from suspension I will do what I can to mend my fences directly with her . begged you, over and over, to leave her alone. The persistence of your unwelcome attentions and insinuations frighten her. She does not want to hear from you directly or indirectly. Message 17422314
