Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (29366)	5/12/2002 10:08:20 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<On the way, one of the men kept ranting about overcrowding, and how he wished a disease would kill 90% of the population. //Sounds to me like Eugene would be a great place for these eco-wackos to act out their heart-felt desire\\...> Hawk, I agree. It's amusing how people go on about overcrowding and how the world needs fewer people, but they very rarely seem to be willing to do the decent thing. If you ask of people whether they are surplus to requirements, you find very few who agree with the sentiment. The few who do want to end it all, often because of terminal disease in old age, are forced against their will to continue to live, being hooked up to breathing, feeding and watering gizmoes so those owning them can continue to get money. If it was costing those who force them to live against their will the cost of forcing them to live, we'd soon see a change in policy. We recently had an envirowacko criminal thug murder the Nederlands politician in defence of animal rights or something. I recommend the Eugene crowd go on a White Pointer feeding expedition [the damn things are now protected in some countries]. One chewed up somebody in Australia recently but that's okay say the politicians [and ecowackoenvironuts, because he was in the shark's territory]. That would help reduce the human population and feed one of their buddies. I say the more the merrier, but it would be nice to have some eugenics to improve the DNA pool. We can breed vicious, aggressive dogs and nice gentle happy types, so the same could be done with humans. Women are in a position to make that change if they choose. Women must prefer bulk murder alpha male dominance, so I guess they only have themselves to blame for the mess surrounding them. Women have been active in eugenics for a long time but maybe with some genetic engineering they could speed up the process. Waiting for natural mutation is slow. The hand that selects the male and rocks the cradle rules the world. Mqurice

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (29366)	5/12/2002 10:09:35 PM
From: quehubo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Certainly the Eco-wackos expect to part of the surviving 10%.