Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (35928)	5/13/2002 9:42:33 AM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

<<If that is not "winning," then I don't know the meaning of the word! >> I just looked up "win" in an online dictionary. The definition? "Win: having shorted LNUX over 300." Boy, these modern dictionaries sure are different than my old Webster's. . . . the freep

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (35928)	5/13/2002 10:09:58 AM
From: Terry Whitman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

OK- You got me there. You can win by not being in. Particularly not being IN between about Naz 6000 and 1500- And I won that game. Am I crazy to think that there's a good chance that the selling has been a little overdone by now? I think most folks have been overcome by fear at this point-and that fear and indecision will likely keep ahold of them far too long. The bears OTOH, may be experiencing a bit of that greed and overconfidence that slaughtered the bulls back in da bubble dayz. BWDIK- I'm just a old Kentucky gambler that needs a daily double here to get back on track. <g>