Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (47019)	5/13/2002 1:20:24 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

I appreciate the post. And this was precisely my point, and it's a simple one you wouldn't think was as difficult to grasp as it has been for CH and, I think but am not sure, JCD: . Moreover, I'd go further and say there is no way that, if the suspension resulted from an "informant's" tip, that Jeff could say with complete certainty that CH was not involved.... I also think it's no biggie in any event, since Poet did violate the TOU then, and acknowledges it, except that if it were true and provable that CH gave the tip to whoever the "informant" was, it might be a relevant item in the presentation of a legal case regarding harassment. Again: I don't know who did it, directly or indirectly.