SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47078)5/13/2002 2:38:43 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
" You missed at least one."

You are correct. It was not intentional.

#8. "Somebody who doesn't like me and who knew of the relationship turned it in with the hope that suspicion would fall on me, as indeed it did. It could have been more an attack on me than on Poet. If that's the case, certain people here would have turned out to have played perfectly into this person's plans. Heck, it could even have been Poet herself, or E. Perhaps not likely, but also perhaps no less unlikely than some of your scenarios.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (47078)5/13/2002 2:59:02 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Thank you for pointing that out. And so, even for you there seems to be reason for concern over the issue of Poet's demise. This raises another question, though. Do you know who the informant was or how the information was "brought" to SI Jeff? Just curious.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News