Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (47156)	5/13/2002 6:02:16 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The case? Its been done to death. But even if it hadn't, the creepy post the whacko made about his "relationship" with Poet last week or the week before should have dispelled your doubts. Or his attempts to muscle Laz into giving him access to SMBR. Its really already right there if you care to see it. JLA

To: Neocon who wrote (47156)	5/13/2002 6:06:04 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

I will be interested to see whether anybody comes forward to lay out the case, as you have requested. I would be interested in reading it myself. E, principally, has been telling me for a while that Poet is afraid of me, but I can't see on what basis that could be true. There is, or course, the contretemps with SI over Jeff suspending me contrary to SI's rules, but while there has been much uninformed speculation about that, only SI and I know the facts, and it was really a quite simple contract issueb between SI and me which has been turned into some sort of cause celebre. And it didn't even involve a single post made to Poet! E's main comment to me has been that I "don't get it." Well, she's right -- I don't. Maybe someone can explain it to you so that you get it, and then maybe you can explain it to me so that I get it, too.