SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Anatolia Minerals Development Ltd V.YMC.U -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (335)5/15/2002 11:02:20 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 468
 
I don't think it's the results (whatever they were?) that shaved 20% off the stock price, but I do think it's the most god awful written IR I've ever seen that did it.



To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (335)5/15/2002 4:58:18 PM
From: GeoDude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 468
 
Bruce,

thanks for this link. Very interesting report. Key new findings for me:

1) oxide level about 20m below surface i.e. most (90%?) gold resources locked in sulphides

2) gold recovery from sulphides is only 10% using "cheap" methods

3) with new holes and some guesses, deposit bounded to North, East and West. Going deeper under bedcover to South. Potential reserves (my very big guess) is about 50-60 million tons mineable (p50 case) at a weighted average of 3 g/ton (or about 6 million oz).

The good news is that this would be enough for a more expensive gold extraction system. No credit given to the Cu but that is only a few $/ton max.

No doubt that they can find more similar stuff nearby. I now believe the company is worth much more than $1/share and I have just bought some shares in the low 90s.

Any comments old friend? Am I miscalculating as usual?

Cheers

LIA