Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (12283)	5/14/2002 3:10:09 PM
From: nsumir81	Respond to of 19219

I agree about the "Retail Sales". I said the same on Yahoo some time back last year. Keep revising the previous month down, so the comparison looks better. He he

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (12283)	5/18/2002 11:00:26 PM
From: nsumir81	Respond to of 19219

Michael Finsterwald/others:Tidbits on Retail sales 'surge'.. As usual, the devil is in the details ragingbull.lycos.com The Non-Existent Surge In Retail Sales As we suspected, the widely ballyhooed April retail sales report was much ado about nothing. As reported on a seasonally adjusted basis (taking into account both the month and the changing date of the Easter holiday) April sales rose 1.2%. This was immediately hailed by economists, strategists and the media as proof that consumers were spending with abandon. A closer examination of the numbers, however, indicate that this is not the case. On an unadjusted basis April sales were up by a meager 0.2% from March. The actual big gain really took place in March, when retail sales increased 12.6% over February. This increase, however, was ignored at the time since it was seasonally adjusted to a gain of only 0.1%. The concept of seasonal adjustments do make sense, however, since February was a winter month with no holiday. Therefore the March unadjusted gain was also not significant. Given all these caveats, how do we make sense of the numbers? We believe that the most meaningful way to interpret these figures is to look at them on a year-to-year basis. This eliminates both the random volatility of month-to-month statistics and the difficulty of making proper seasonal adjustments. On this basis, the combined retail sales for March and April 2002 were up 3.9% from a year earlier. Since year-over-year retail sales have been gaining between 3 and 4% since November 2000—with the exception of September and October 2001—we can easily see that there wasn’t any actual spurt in sales in April. While it’s true that sales haven’t fallen out of bed, they haven’t broken out to the upside either.