Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORP. (GTSM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gammaray who wrote (311)	5/14/2002 2:41:08 PM
From: Mahatmabenfoo	Respond to of 394

---- Worth Allred who you delite in discriminating against because of his age. That's Norm's line too. It's propaganda, but very bad propaganda. Allred is an outrageous fraud -- he claimed in 1987 to have the biggest breakthrough in semi-conductor history. That's a long time ago, which is exactly the point: that's what all of the GTSM pipe dreams are based on, and (with Pratt and Porter gone) Allred is all GTSM has left. Age matters in technology. Breakthroughs are done by younger men. Einstein made his major contributions before he was 25. Even if Allred wasn't a fraud the odds would be against him and GTSM. If GTSM had anything somebody -- an investor or a customer or the federal governemnt -- would have funded GTSM long ago. Between 1984 when GTSM was born and now were two of the biggest tech-booms in the history of the world. And GTSM has done nothing but lie -- like the 1996 lie about production facilities which you admit but which is a long time ago to you. Only it's the same half-time crowd at the helm. The most damning thing is the fact that after making investors wait for a year for written results of the test of its boule in 2001, it produced nothing -- only a "white paper" it wrote itself based on visual observations that's one of the most pathetic attempts at pumping in history. Did you ever try reading it? It's a laff a line, even if you don't know it's a cover for the fact that the only boule GTSM admits it sent for testing failed. You notice in putting GTSM down I don't have to put you down. Something you and Norm may learn one day, if only after a couple more reincarnations. - Charles

To: gammaray who wrote (311)	5/14/2002 2:44:49 PM
From: Mahatmabenfoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 394

---Ok, at last you ask an honest question and I am most happy to answer it except you're not answering the question. You voted against Pratt because insiders at GTSM convinced you he was bad -- as you told us here. BUT THAT WAS BEFORE THE STUFF YOU QUOTE. What inside information did you get before the vote that convinced you that Pratt was a bad guy? Do you realize that as shareholder your vote didn't matter to get Pratt to resign as AN OFFICER? (clue: shareholders ordinarily vote for directors, not officers). The whole campaign against Pratt was calculated propaganda --- to set up a fallguy explanation for the latest reason this company has accomplished nothing since 1984. - Charles