SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (47349)5/14/2002 6:02:04 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I admit, it is no lose, and a way of moving on......



To: The Philosopher who wrote (47349)5/15/2002 12:06:53 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"If I don't, but get rebanned anyhow, I can go back to posting to or about Poet."

How many possibilities can we put together of things to consider doing when we have nearly 7 billion people on the planet and limitless forms of activity? Too many to imagine numerically.

Why did you attach that trailer to what you would consider doing if SMBR wasn't an option? This is why I asked you to consider the perspective of others on this issue. This is why no matter what agreements seem to be on the table, the suspicion of an alterior motive will not go away. Every time a faint flicker presents itself you dowse it with something like this. I do not understand why you are not able to see how troubling that is to me and others? Even more troubling for me is that it didn't seem to bother Neocon. Life is full of wonders I guess.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (47349)5/17/2002 1:57:43 AM
From: E  Respond to of 82486
 
Hey, kids, look at this:

If I start posting to our about Poet, the ban can be reenacted.

If I don't, but get rebanned anyhow, I can go back to posting to or about Poet.


Look who gets to be the judge of whether he has been re-banned ("anyway") for posting to or about Poet! CH does! And what happens if Laz says he's violated the agreement and he says he doesn't?

More blackmail! I can go back to posting to or about Poet

I left something off the list of what would be my requirements if I were Poet:

He'd have to swear on his ministerial Bible that he will never resume, ever, under any circumstances, posting to or about me, never use it again as a weapon, as he has been doing for months and just, in this post, threatened, if he felt like it when he thought something was unfair, to do again.

This is typical CH.