SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (47356)5/14/2002 10:21:51 PM
From: E  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
You are one sordid creep.

How do those questions or their answers affect the scenario at all? They are merely a blatant attempt on your part to join CH in his campaign to embarrass Poet by insinuation, and to blame her, CH's victim, for the stalking.

The fact that CH and Poet were once friends, and thus had, then, a friendly relationship, does not justify his continuing, after that friendly relationship has been definitively terminated, to post constant insinuating references to "our relationship," after she has begged him to stop. Begged him.

How do those insinuating, utterly irrelevant questions of yours justify the post below from CH to Poet, who has begged him for months to leave her alone and not post to her? It was sent two or three weeks ago. It was designed and sent purely as torment.

Hi, Poet. I understand that you've been missing me.
Sorry, I've been kind of busy recently, and not able to post to you as often as you might like. But I will have some time free shortly, so will be able to resume our discussions...


How does it justify the disgusting "roller skate and key" evocation, from the same day?

You appear to be implying that she asked for it. Is that it? As in, "You know you want it, baby,"?-- Is that what you're implying with those insinuating questions? That she is getting what she deserves? Wants?

What?



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (47356)5/15/2002 11:06:43 PM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 82486
 
I'm surprised at you Dithers, very surprised.... The more I read, the more I learn about the personalties and moral values of the people here, and it is becoming very revealing indeed...



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (47356)5/16/2002 2:15:15 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Look, JCD, you're going to get an answer to your insinuating desk sergeant's questions! CH can now post the PM's that evidently justify his appalling behavior, in your mind. Poet just phoned me to go to IHub, and I did:

This, from IHub. I have to go out now for a while, so please pass it on to CH:

I see that Mr. H. and Mr. D. are implying that if people knew the whole story of what went on in PMs, they would understand that his unwelcome attentions to me are justifiable.

I now give my permission to post any PM (or PM's) I may have sent to him which he claims justify those posts. My privacy and that of my family will be violated, but I have done nothing to be ashamed of, so choose that instead of these insinuations.


The only conditions are that other SI members names must be crossed out and that any PMs he posts must be verifiable as accurate by SI Jeff.

Poet

investorshub.com



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (47356)5/16/2002 7:14:51 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Soon we will be seeing the PM's which you so strongly suspect, presumably on Father Hodgkin's word, exculpate him for his unwelcome cyber-attentions to Poet, and justify the insinuations he's made that caused you, JCD, to believe that such questions as the ones below, asked to Poet (I mean to "a complainant"!), would reveal that she somehow had this treatment coming:

Folks, JCD's Desk Sergeant's Questions Will Now Be Answered!:

"These things he alluded to that you told him privately -- what exactly were these things?

"Why were you sending him private messages?"

"Did you tell him things about your private life that would be embarrassing to you? Why?"

"After it all started before September 11th, have you refrained from sending any messages to him or answering any he sent you?"


We will be seeing the PM's that Explain All, according to your affine CH, won't we JCD? And if he squirms out of it now, you will stop defending his behavior, I assume?