Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47535)	5/15/2002 6:19:52 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You're not helping your cause. First you claim you couldn't answer because I limited your choice of answers, now you say it's because of litigation. You are a fraud - but a talented one. You must have something going if you can get smart guys like Neo and Dithers to carry your water...

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47535)	5/15/2002 11:40:01 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

As to the post from St. Bill, my direct response was: siliconinvestor.com specific request was "Please don't post another thing to my wife." To the best of my recollection, I have complied with his request completely. I have not, as far as I can recall, posted to her on this thread or elsewhere on SI... I'll say your memory is not perfect. On April 26, St. Bill posted: "Please don't post another thing to my wife. This you have been asked formally and repeatedly." On May 3, a week later, you posted this to his wife: "Did you see, Poet, that E claimed that we have no relationship? How wrong she is. We've had a relationship for years, now, and we still have one. Sometimes it's been very strong, sometimes it's been a bit strained, sometimes it's been rocky. Right now we're going through one of the rocky periods. I recognize that. But that's okay. Ups and downs happen in all relationships. I understand that for a while, at least, you're choosing to talk to me through others, indirectly, rather than posting to me directly, and that's okay. I understand that it'll take some time for us to get back on track. But we can work on it. Meanwhile, it's okay with me if you want to keep communicating through others for the time being. It doesn't hurt my feelings."

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47535)	5/16/2002 12:22:54 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

BTW! I had to laugh out loud when I got home this evening and noticed the change in your posts since you learned that she and Bill have talked to the police and a lawyer, including the frequent use of "relationship" in a quite different way than you've been using it to and about Poet (a way that has been very... suggestive! and yucky, too) these months! I guess you needed it to be yucky for your previous yucky purposes, and now you need it to be neutral! It's interesting and amusing to see you changing your persona.