Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47587)	5/15/2002 11:57:30 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Okay, how about this? Is there some kind of PM or email, generically, that she could have sent you in the past, just SOME KIND, any kind, any kind at all, that, as you are clearly implying... would justify your subsequent persistent posting to her against her will, including suing to keep the ability to continue doing it, including ignoring her husband's pleas, including the insinuating "strong" relationship posts, etc. etc. Just yes or no to the generic question, "IS THERE SUCH A THING IN EXISTENCE IN THE WORLD AS POSTS OF A SORT THAT WOULD JUSTIFY BEHAVIOR LIKE YOUR BEHAVIOR TO POET? You see I am not asking if Poet made them. I'm asking if there are posts she MIGHT have made that would justify what you have been doing to her? (Not counting if she did something like harm your children, burn down your house, run over your dog, stuff like that that might suggest revenge.)

To: The Philosopher who wrote (47587)	5/16/2002 12:38:37 AM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

I have said, I'm not going to discuss Poet's and my private communications, and I'm not. End of discussion. I can't help but giggle at this. Are you a multiple personality or something?! You have alluded insinuatingly to those very communications over and over again. You have filled the air with implications about them! We only know of their existence because of your allusions to them! You use them even today as the justification for the unwanted attentions you subject Poet to! Your alter ego Dithers has elaborated the insinuations with this little prize of gratuitously suggestive implication: ...there may be a few small holes that need plugging... in a docu-drama, one might expect the father or the sergeant to ask just a few more questions. Um, for example: "These things he alluded to that you told him privately -- what exactly were these things? "Why were you sending him private messages?" "Did you tell him things about your private life that would be embarrassing to you? Why?" "After it all started before September 11th, have you refrained from sending any messages to him or answering any he sent you?" I think in the interest of reality, the desk sergeant especially would be obliged to be a bit more probing as to how or why this man might have come under the impression of a "relationship" between them, before he starts swinging his nightstick. Don't you think so? That post of yours is hilarious. Really. "Not going to discuss Poet's and my private communications" indeed. Sheesh. You never shut up about them. How about telling us at last something some of us might WANT to know for a change? Like... what KIND of posts of Poet's might cause you to pursue her in this way? Might justify it?