Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Return to Sender who wrote (3162)	5/16/2002 11:15:56 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95525

I don't look at the SOX at all. I normally look at the nasdaq. But lately it seems the bio-tech sector is having a large influence. So, I'll have to switch to the SOX instead. I think the b2b number is excellent. But like nearly every one else, I think AMAT, KLAC, NVLS, etc.... already reflect a lot of good news. I prefer to buy into the customers of the equipment vendors. On the theory that they will see any pick up in demand first. So their Q reports will show the sequential improve,ent before the equip vendors. My favorites are ALtera, LSI (unfortunately), Intel, XLNX, NSM, and TXN. I think these are very well leveraged when their capacity utilization increases. And their margins are quite high. My largest holding is Western Digital, which I would not recommend to anyone. It is great for trading, but very treacherous. I also have the usual assortment of losers. Like ADCT, JDSU, ITWO, EMC, and Oracle. Though I think their day will eventually come, too. I very much agree with one thing you said. Which is that some stocks will do well, but that a whole bunch of others will go bk. Just because a stock is down is no reason to buy it. I think there is no substitute for being very familiar with the business of the company. Which is very hard and very time consuming to do. Good luck to all of us. Even the shorts. Sarmad

To: Return to Sender who wrote (3162)	5/17/2002 12:14:30 AM
From: Cary Salsberg	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 95525

I am 81% stock, 19% cash in my brokerage accounts. I think we are in a new bull market which started after the bottom caused by 9/11. I have thought so since November, 2001. We have been testing my hypothesis by testing the 9/11 low. Last Wednesday and Monday and Tuesday were very strong and seem to be setting up a successful test. AMAT and BTB are strong positive signs for both the economy and the new bull market. The AMAT price is double the 9/11 low! Today, it is less overvalued than at any time since early in the bubble, but it needs to rest and let the economy and the rest of the market play catch up. This need to rest, is also true of many of my favorite SOXX stocks, KLAC, NVLS, XLNX, and MXIM. ALTR and LLTC are behind the other 5. I think is is reasonable to expect a trading range until the 4th quarter. The bull hypothesis will be met by last Tuesday's low holding and and slow growth in revenues and earnings should keep most companies below the recovery from 9/11 highs. By the 4th quarter, I expect that fears of a double dip will give way to the beginnings of visibility for the next real technology lead economic expansion. I readily admit that Q4 may be too early. The bubble hangover continually lasts longer than predictions. In any case, technology business will be stronger in Q4, but possibly only modestly so. For a while, I have said that this is a very difficult environment for equity investing. Ken Fisher's declaration that this may or may not be the end of the bear offers further confirmation. We have not discussed the inventory draw down situation. Let us suppose that the consumption of a company's product is currently growing at 5% annually. Also let us assume that 50% of the company's customers are drawing down inventory. If all inventory is drawn down to zero at the same time, the company will have a one time revenue jump of 100% followed by 5% annual growth. This example illustrates that many technology companies will have a revenue growth spurt where the % growth rate will exceed the growth rate of end user consumption. The rate will eventually settle back to the end user consumption rate. Almost all technology companies have had inventory problems and many have probably entered the revenue jump phase. We should take care against the inclination to use the "jump" rate as a long term growth rate and we should not be spooked when rates return to sustainable end user consumption rates.