Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (47822)	5/17/2002 11:42:43 AM
From: J. C. Dithers	Respond to of 82486

Bravo, Karen. That post is worth more than whole kit and kaboodle of 10 million words posted here. Are you off on assignment to the Middle East?

To: Lane3 who wrote (47822)	5/17/2002 11:49:30 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

when one party cries "uncle" or "no mas, no mas" or "I beg you to stop," you stop. Do you mean by this that when Poet begged CH, and her husband did, to stop, he should have stopped?

To: Lane3 who wrote (47822)	5/17/2002 11:54:33 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Do you agree with me that CH should now agree to post toorabout Poet "no mas," ever, directly or indirectly? She has "begged" him to.

To: Lane3 who wrote (47822)	5/17/2002 11:58:06 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The problem is, I figured out why he would not take the deal,and confirmed it by PM. The sticking point is whether impersonal allusions to Poet's posts will be taken as violations, thus effectively keeping him out of any discussion she is in. I advised him that it would be better to take his chances, because of how it looked, but I understood the objection. And, be it noted, I have been pretty harsh in my criticism of him this week. It just looks like I am "on his side" in comparison.......