Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (47909)	5/17/2002 4:21:46 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

No, it certainly depends on what he has to say, about which I am curious. However, at this moment, I do not think that the state of the case has substantially changed. Poet suffered. I never denied she did. CH behaved badly. I never denied that, either. It has always been a matter of degree. Of course, the idea that I had that Poet might have over- reacted is strengthened by knowledge of her vulnerability, but I do not consider that conclusive.........

To: E who wrote (47909)	5/18/2002 8:56:37 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I was shocked -- absolutely shocked--to read you writing "I have a great idea for what you should do with it! First roll it up tightly, and then get back to me for further instructions! " That is perhaps one of the 10 most suggestively vulgar posts made this year. Actually, I wasn't shocked. But I was quite interested to make note of it. And of Laz posting to a known jew that he would support Adolf Hitler if they had gone to the same college. I choose to be amused rather than insulted that people who post such things should have the chutzpah to try to hector me on posting etiquette and responsible commentary. I suppose that just shows that it really does take one to know one.